Sunday, January 27, 2008

Muhammad Haque daily world ethical commentary from Gordon Browned Britain-The bankruptcy and shamelessness and violence of the Channel 4 News - 2

The Muhammad Haque daily world ethical commentary from Gordon Browned Britain

2300 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 27 January 2008


The Channel 4 News ‘Political Awards’, broadcast today [1900 Hrs GMT Sunday 27 January 2008] by the UK TV station Channel 4

That was probably the last time that Channel 4 would indulge in the obscenity in that outrageously shameless way.

The theme was wrong. The participants were wrong. The contents were absent. And the running order had no order. The date was wrong. The jokes were painfully unfunny. And Ian Pissoff of Private Lie was not at all justified as a giver of opinion.

But then Channel 4 news is not exactly the station that springs to mind when a news programme with integrity, honesty and ethicality is sought r thought about ..

It is the programme that is broadcast by the PORN Channel. Although manufactured by ITN, the agenda of the ‘channel 4 news’ is as bankrupt, as pro-Empire, as racist, as ignorant and as sub-pornographic as is the rest of the Channel 4 station and its collective ‘broadcasting’ agenda.

It is a disservice to the public in the UK.

How could they give a ‘political award’ to any of them when every recipient linked with the UK Parliament and participating in the propaganda event had in one way or another contributed to or supported the waging if invasion and murderous war on innocent millions in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

While still others had done and were still doing things in violation of the fundamental human rights of people all over the place. In Asia., In Africa. In central Asia. In parts of Europe. In south and southern Africa. In parts of South Africa. In the occupied parts of North America. In 'Australia'.

It praises a troupe of Ken Livingstone Ethnicity Linked paraders in that broadcast.

This broadcast today coincides with the appearance on the internet sites belonging to UK main stream news outlets and publishers and in the associated ‘mainstream British newspapers’ of probably the largest number of derogatory articles EVER pub shed about the ‘Undone mayor” Ken Livingstone himself in one single day..


The contrast is historic.

It is far more important than any sporadic item of accidental 'news' that might have been carried in any of the weekday bulletins fronted by Jon SLOW Snow himself.

SLOW is one of the corrupt state’s genial-faced perpetrators of pernicious lies.

SLOW tells lies in a digested way. So most of the zombified audience. So what on earth was this ‘Operation Black Vote’ ? Typically uninformative beneath a facade of convoluted stage effects and scenes designed to give the additional subliminal messages to the candidates for consolidated brainwashing, Jon SLOW contrived to convey clarity.

He feigned affinity with anther manageable display of tokenized yoofs from downtrodden Hackney. And then they had the two-member ensemble from Wales. It had to be from Wales. The its bitsy fabrication was not concealed as a semi-political staged stunt. It was outrageously calmly exhibited in a wanton show of defiance to taste and common as a brazen insult of the worst kind. It was lower than the low.

And Jon Slow was more shameless than any of the dodgy, shift, untrustworthy, evasive 'news' characters that have featured in any of the editions fronted by him of the Channel 4 News in the allegedly august period of the relevant past ten years… And then they had another politically dead and ethically empty and morality-free body parked in the assemblage of invitees and awardees upon whose features the Channel Four Political Award camera crew kept on focussing at every available excuse…

[To be continued]



External web sites or web pages may not be accessed fro this site at this time [2325 GMT Sunday 27 January 2008]:

Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against Big Business Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘upper chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London.



For the LATEST NEWS, information and commentary follow the guidance just below this

CLICK HERE For the LATEST NEWS, information and commentary ......And to view the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, INCLUDING the updated texts of the summary of the Khoodeelaar! CONSTITUTIONAL LAW objections being put to the UK House of Lords against the purpose, against the promotion, against the contents and against the procedures attached to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as those have been created, applied and followed in the UK Parliament …

ALL materials as published here [except those that we occasionally refer to and quote from external sources - the sources are clearly identified and their authorship/s is/are acknowledged] are originally conceived, researched, written and edited. The fact that they are published for 'free' access via the internet must not be confused with their being legally and ethical and moray unprotected. The materials are NOT to be reprinted or re-published in any form except with the full legal and IPR statements as published by the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and the Editor being also included in full.
For legal permission and details, send your request in full in an e-mail to
aadhikarlaw@yahoo.co.uk

This should be done before any assumption of consent, permission or agreement

This the 10th Edition of the day of the AADHIKARonline London UK was updated at 2255 Hrs GMT on Sunday 27 January 2008
This web site is being brought to you by AADHIKAR Media Foundation supporting Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against the Big Business-dictated Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘upper chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London.

[More info later]




From©Muhammad Haque
To
Editor in Chief online.editor@timesonline.co.uk


Is it too much to ask Gordon Brown to practise compliance with the rules of constitutionality?
Or is Gordon Brown afraid that constitutionality will expose the shallowness, the waste and the unsustainability contained in the unwanted and the damaging schemes he appears intent on pushing through the unaccountably whipped Houses of the UK parliament?
The seriously flawed Department for Transport [DfT] is the only UK central Govt department that fell foul of its comprehensive constitutional obligations in a very big way more than 20 years ago.
Two decades on, the DfT seems to be being run by the same types of wrong headed, unconstitutional interests that had displayed Govt disregard for constitutional standards – standards that the same Govt peddling the CrossRail hole pot s unconstitutionally today otherwise preaches and flaunts.
The DfT has been misleading the public and abusing executive influence over a cowed parliament [that is permanently whipped to let big business agenda through without practically any scrutiny] to push thorough a most empty scheme like Crossrail. Those of us opposing the seriously flawed 'Crossrail Bill' [now in the uk house of lords, the upper chamber] have been asking the DfT for the past four years to behave constitutionally. We have found that the Govt is not interested in actually observing its constitutional obligations on transport.
This is why we are preparing to mount legal challenges to the DfT [=UK Govt] as soon as the pro-Crossrail Bill-whipped formalities are over in the UK House of lords about the 'Crossrail Bill'.
Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ CAMPAIGN
0100 Hrs
London
Sunday 27 January 2008


By©Muhammad Haque
2050 Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 January 2008

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it is currently in the UK ‘House of Lords’ – the ‘upper chamber’ in the UK parliament] CAMPAIGN Manifesto for London 2008 – the next parts due here during this weekend.


By©Muhammad Haque

1440 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 January 2008:


After Peter Hain’s resignation, it is not tenable for Gordon Brown to say that his administration is made of only truth-tellers … get Ruth Kelly to tell the truth about the CrossRail hole plot



coming here shortly


KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - advising Gordon Brown in the hour after Peter Hain's resignation news breaks, that he, Brown should scrap the CRASSrail hole plot Bill in its present form...


Khoodeelaar! defending the community in the East End of London, situated in the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’ which is described by independently active students of in income disparity [=inequality] , social exclusion and discrimination and deprivation in the UK today, as being either one of the or the most deprived inner city area in all of England .. Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown that he should scrap the attacks on the East End of London and on other counties across London that are still contained in the seriously flawed and wasteful ‘CrossRail Bill’ scheme– in the wake of the announcement in the past hour [time calculated at 1410 Hrs GMT 24 January 2008] of the much-anticipated resignation by Peter Hain from Gordon Brown’s cabinet, Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown – STOP being arrogant in showing your backing for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone.. Start telling the truth about the really pernicious elements that have pushed you into the corner where you had to make the bold but evidentially and objectively unjustifiable utterances fir the CRASSrail project. Listen to the people and you will stay in office… If you dismiss the people who are telling the truth and if you continue to go down the road of hypocrisy, spin and contradictions and if you get addicted to preferring to listen to those who bid you to rely on the courtiers and sycophants like Steve STUPID Richards of the ‘Independent’ then you will find that you are lacking in essential legitimacy to remain in office… This is not a threat, Gordon.. This is a warning that all truthful observers of your time so far in office at 'Number 10 Downing Street' will want you to pay attention to …Khoodeelaar!…continuing to show up the unconstitutionality of conduct by the UK Govt that is being used as a tool for Big Business to loot the UK public under the misleading covers of the London CrossRail hole project….


[To be continued]


CROSSRAIL hole-plotter “undone mayor” Ken Livingstone has been defended [!!!] by Darcus Howe. As he has been by the weekly Vice [Oops! ‘Voice’ ‘newspaper’].
Darcus Howe is also confessing to treating with equal respectfulness the one-time ‘Labour Party Black Section’ –banner-flaunting self-seekers Keith Vaz and Diane Abbott [1983-87] [1987 was the ‘general election’ which let those two into the CORRUPTING House of Commons as ‘Labour Party ETHNIC MPs’ along with the late Bernie Grant and the unlamented Paul Boateng].
There is no evidence that ANY SINGLE ONE of the ethnicity-linked time servers in either the House of Commons or in the even more corruptly appointed and installed 'House of Lords' has justified any hype attaching to their ‘appointments’ – none of them has shown any consistent or memorable or mentionable parliamentary democratic or ethical integrity let alone independence of mind or thought in any field and in any debate or on any issue that really matters in the context of the so-called black or ethnic representation in the UK parliament
I say 'so-called'!
Why? I shall give the criteria and description and justification for saying that. Before I do that, questions must be asked. The first questions include these:

What does Darcus Howe know that those who have apparently questioned Ken LYINGSTILL Livingstone’s integrity don’t know? What does Darcus Howe have as demonstrable evidence of his ‘career’ that is made up of ‘giving up personal gains for the sake of the collective society’? Has Darcus Howe EVER published the facts of any such? OTHER than the hypes that he fomented at the expense of un-named black people who really made the main sacrifices at both the Notting Hill battles and at Lewisham?
Has Darcus Howe been given the platform on the NewSS [=’New Statesman and `Society’ – now reverted back to ‘New Statesman’] because of the 'integrity' of Howe's 'character' and 'actions' before he was able to qualify for the Lyinsgtill's ‘Freedom Pass’ that he [Howe] has been exhibiting in ‘substantiation’ of his overly pretentious presumption that his statement [carried, ironically in the NEW SS website and publication - the same one that has Martin Bright as its 'political editor'] of support for Ken Livingstone amounts to something so significant that no other member of the ‘black’ population in the UK can universally verifiably claim to lend to THEIR opinion or views on the matter?



[To be continued]
1035 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 January 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - continuing to update the UK House of Lords [as the legislative ‘upper chamber’ of the UK parliament, now preparing to formally ‘consider’ the ‘CrossRail Bill’] on the record and the evidence showing the unconstitutionality of conduct by the main touts for Big Business CRASSRAIL scam...
We add to the already existent massive files on Ken Livingstone’s lying perpetrations for the CRASSrail hole scam. This analysis of Ken Livingstone’s irresponsible and careeristic fiction [below] one is taken from the website today [Wednesday 23 January 2008] of a money magazine that exposes Livingstone’s subsidiary lying project - Livingstone’s peddling of the London Olympics 2012 myths and hypes.


The magazine publishes the analysis from another source, named in the contents below, that exposes the immorality and the inaccuracy of Ken Livingstone's maths…..
His maths too are a myth…

" Ken's Olympic-sized miscalculation
23.01.2008
Here is a little mathematical conundrum for you. What number, if compounded at 6% per year, becomes 800m… but if compounded at 16% per year becomes worth 1.8bn? And how many years would this take? And if multiplied by 20% per year, would this number be 3bn?


These are some of the questions posed by recent revelations that, in order to pay for the Olympic Games, money will be ‘borrowed’ from the National Lottery Fund; to be repaid from land sales once the great sporting jamboree is over. Sorting through the tangled maze of last week’s statements on this matter it appears that the government needs to recoup £800m from land sales post 2012, in order, says Ken Livingstone ‘to repay all the debts that we have incurred.’ I wonder whether this includes interest on the borrowed money? Somehow I doubt it.


This figure, described as ‘conservative’ – I’ll come to this in a moment! – assumes 6% annual appreciation of the value of the land. Ken, though, reckons that the sale of land is more likely to bring in £1.8bn. This is based on annual appreciation of 16% per year, a figure that should have every investor rushing to Stratford, but which is bizarrely described by Ken as ‘quite cautious’.




We can derive from these calculations that the land is presently worth about £470m. But to confuse the matter still further the London Mayor's director of planning and regeneration, Neale Coleman told the Commons’ Culture, Media and Sports Committee that ‘using the average land price inflation of 19% over the last 20 years, the LDA could make £3billion.’


This cannot be the case. If the land is now worth £470m then 19% annual appreciation takes its value to £2.3bn. You would need 23% annual appreciation before you got £3bn.


This little political spat raises all sorts of questions, of which whether or not Ken Livingstone and his henchmen can do maths is the least important. The two big questions are: what is conservative? And, is the past any guide to the future?



A 'conservative' consumption?
The so-called conservative assumption that the value of land in the Stratford region of East London will grow at ‘only’ 6% per year is based on the fact that this apparently was the appreciation recorded in the worst year of the last twenty.
That may be true, but anybody who assumes that the value of anything will appreciate above the rate of inflation and above the level of long-term interest rates is, at the very least, not allowing for the possibility that something could go wrong. This has echoes of Northern Rock, whose chief executive Adam Applegarth said that its business strategy worked very well ‘until the credit crunch came along’.
The reason that we conservatively put a roof on top of our houses is because we cannot be sure that the sun will always shine. That is conservatism. Was the possibility of a recession between now and 2012 not considered? Or was the possibility that there might be a hiccough in the property bull market conveniently forgotten in the urgency of siphoning off the Lottery money?
Did it not strike anyone that 6% per annum is actually quite a high figure? And that Ken’s ‘quite cautious’ 18% is just fantastic? The justification is the apparent 20% or so annual rise in land values in the area over the last twenty years. But might this not have been because land values in Stratford have been bid up in anticipation of the Olympic effect? For sure, this has been the case.
Taking London as a whole, the price of a hectare of land has risen from £759,000 in 1983 to £5.5m now. That represents an annual rise of less than 9%. So Stratford has already far outpaced the capital. Is this because Stratford is a wonderfully attractive place to live? Or could it be because several sharp property speculators have seen the Olympics cruising into view and have been busy buying up land in anticipation?
I think you know the answer to that. So will land values in Stratford rise by 6% per year, allowing the Lottery Fund to get its money back? Perhaps – but it is by no means certain. Will land values continue to rise at 16%, or 19% or 23% per annum. Not a hope! This article is taken from Tom Bulford's free daily email Penny Sleuth "


By©Muhammad Haque


1220 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 January 2008:
More than fifty persons in the East End of London have signed a new campaign declaration in a matter of four hours and reaffirmed their commitment against Crossrail hole. This is from one part of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area where Khoodeelaar! Has been mobilising opposition against the CrossRail assault.
The local residents responded to Khoodeelaar! Campaign information that the current procedural period to register opposition to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK House of Lords was due to end in a matter of days.
It is expected that more than 100 others will sign their commitment and back the Khoodeelaar! formal objections to the CrossRail Bill to be put to the House of Lords this week.
At a campaign meeting held in the Whitechapel area, new condemnation was made against the local Tower Hamlets Council for continuing to lie to the local community about the Council’s collusion for the CrossRail hole plot.
[To be continued]
[Texts from an earlier part of this Khoodeelaar! commentary by MUHAMMAD HAQUE and as published by Khoodeelaar! on the Internet today Monday 21 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! The East London Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole plot’ [the ‘Crossrail Bill’] updating the publication of the evidential context for the demand being reiterated this week to the UK Parliament [‘house of lords] to scrap the ‘Crossrail bill’ and to recommend that the transport needs of London and the relevant other parts of the country are addressed by the uk govt giving priority to what the transport needs of the ordinary public are, what the sustainable solution is…
Khoodeelaar! asks the UK House of Lords [the ‘upper chamber’ of parliament- which in practice is the ‘lower caber’…] to show that it is acing in its role on making UK legislation in a universally objectively describable constitutionally compatible manner and that it, the UK House of Lords is and active and rigorous, ethical, intelligent and up-to-date forum for the competent, truthful, honest and timely scrutiny of any legislative proposal. …….
Khoodeelaar! Question as put to the House of Lords this morning [Monday 21 January 2008] is in the context of the statement made by [Alistair Darling who at the time was] the Secretary of state for Transport as he introduced the ‘Crossrail Bill’ into the UK [lower chamber of parliament] House of Commons in February 2005. As he did so, the Secretary of State said that he was satisfied that the Bill was ‘compatible with the Convention’.
That was not true then.
That is not true now.
Because the ‘petitioning programme’ that is currently on about the objections against the Crossrail Bill [that is now in the House of lords] is being seriously restricted, the Khoodeelaar campaign is demanding to know how the House of lords can justify the restrictions and also claim that they are ding s by acting within the constitutional obligations
The following is quoted from the UK House of Lords administrative office guidance notes about petitioning against the Crossrail Bill.
The answer stated in the quoted part is in contravention of the ECHR.
"CAN I OBJECT TO THE BILL AS A WHOLE?
No.
The Committee will only be able to consider aspects of the project proposed in the bill, which affect people in their private capacity, not fundamental principles involving broader issues (such as whether a cross-London rail link should be constructed). Those issues are discussed and decided by the House of Lords itself (during a debate on the bill on the floor of the House of Lords).
The Committee cannot make recommendations on matters of principle nor do they have the power to reject the bill.
There is no point, therefore, in making political comments, raising general objections to the bill or in raising broad issues of policy in your petition, you should concentrate instead on the specific ways in which the bill directly and specially affects you or those you represent."

[To be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque


0800 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2008



Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole’ plot, No to ‘CRASS rail lies’ like ‘high speed link needed to Heathrow to keep London at the top of the league of world class cities’ - lies that Ken Livingstone has been uttering…


1. KHOODEELAAR! campaigners from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 area set to ask NEW and UPDATED questions and put them to the [‘legislative’] UK House of Lords to demand that the promoter of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the ‘House of Lords’], the UK Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly [MP] produce immediately unambiguous evidence that there is economic justification, there is environmental justification for spending £Billions of public money for a project that is peddled by its peddlers at its ‘most justifiable’ to be one about RUSHING passengers to Heathrow airport and then depositing them into an airport of waiting, of waste, of congested contaminated desperation….
2. What is the point of Crossrail……
3. And other questions….
4. Khoodeelaar! SAYING NO to the congestion of lies by CRASSRail hole-plot backer Ken Livingstone…
5. Those lies can no longer be ignored by the ‘mainstream’…
6. The lies that they told in the ‘London’ ‘evening standard’ for Crossrail…
7. On the one hand the ‘evening standard’ and the lying CRASSRail hole-plotters denounced the ‘long hours, even days’ of waiting chaos at Heathrow and on the other and in almost the same breath they lied and said that CROSSRAIL was ‘vital’ to LINK with Heathrow…
8. Now, where do they propose to take the public once they RUSH them at high speed to Heathrow?
9. What happens when Heathrow is congested?
10. What is the point of the pointless CRASSrail then? ….
[To be continued]

The CURRENT campaign news, information and commentary being created for Khoodeelaar! By the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and published on the Internet is focussed on the CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. What is Khoodeelaar! doing to bring about compliance with the UK’s European Treaty obligations in the conduct of making laws in the UK. Khoodeelaar! is at once embarked on a multi-faceted programme of defence of the ordinary public in London and by extension across the UK against the illegal, unconstitutional, illegitimate behaviour on the part of the UK executive. As this week’s ‘comments’ in the ‘mainstream’ media in the UK has been about the near-disaster [that was, according to a number of news reports, averted only by a worrying 20 seconds!!!] at the Heathrow airport which reportedly occurred when Gordon Brown was in the vicinity, the Khoodeelaar! campaign is going to put appropriate legal and constitutional law emphasis on the demand that it has already put to Gordon Brown’s administration to show the evidence of uncorrupted correlation between the various claims that the Government has been making for the Big Business CrossRail hole plot. Of specific importance is the claim that has been made with insane fanaticism, and echoed by a Ken Livingstone-compromised Gordon Brown in the weeks and months between 1 October 2007 and 1 December 2007, to the effect that one of the most vital ECONOMIC arguments and justifications for Crossrail was that it would link up Heathrow airport with the rest of the ‘City of London’. Now that even Frank Field, MP [Birkenhead, England] [on the BBC Radio 4 programme 'Any Question' as broadcast on Friday 18 and Saturday 19 January 2008] has called Heathrow airport obsolete and assorted other commentators have been able to speak out against any plans to create another terminal at Heathrow airport, questions that Khoodeelaar! has already put to Ruth Kelly [the Current 'Crossrail hole plot-promoting UK Secretary of State at the Department for Transport'] will be updated and reinforced. 2007
Khoodeelaar! will show the constitutional law way forward for solving the genuine transport needs of London
Khoodeelaar! dissecting the language of CrossRail lies by Crossrail promoters
Khoodeelaar! evidence of constitutional and democratic questions as put to the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council – the past four years
Khoodeelaar! questions to the several relevant UK MPs
Khoodeelaar! questions to the office concerned in the UK House of Lords dealing with the House of Lords ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’
Khoodeelaar! diagnosis of the unconstitutionality of the behaviour of Ruth Kelly, Tom Harris and their co-ministers and post-holders in the uk Department for Transport
Khoodeelaar! invokes the ‘lessons’ of 1988 and the follies of the PRE-Crossrail UK Department for Transport and their THEN idiocies which exposed the UK Government of the day [Maggie Thatcher] to Europe-wide ridicule [ as based on the UK's Government’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL, unethical and dishonest behaviour] in a big way
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law updates against the drafting of, the proceedings about and the promotion of the current ‘Crossrail Bill’
Khoodeelaar! campaign updates
Khoodeelaar! breaking news



By Muhammad Haque
1410 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 17 January 2008
As I have been saying for the past almost eight years – since I came across a piece of paper issued by the CRASSrail hole plot-inviting clique in Tower Hamlets – the scheme would bring no benefits to the East End. It could not do so. What is more, the TRANSPORT needs of the UK as a whole or even those of ‘England and Wales’ [my phraseology is devolving here in ‘line’ with the ‘Scottish’ accent....] would not be addressed unless the entire schema was thoroughly revised by taking into truthful account all the factors involved. The KEY factor that I have been stressing ALL Along – and one which is the reason why I decided to label the ‘decision-making’ perpetrators as the ‘corrupt claque’ in control of the Tower Hamlets Council, is that of the deliberate policy of neglecting the ‘education’ of the children, the young people and the adults in the borough of Tower Hamlets… It is this particular one that today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] Times newspaper group website acknowledges in their presentation of the ‘findings’. The Wigan web site is also vindicating, in effect, what I have said and what I shall continue to say on the evidence and on the facts against the ghastly inappropriateness of the WASTEFUL Crossrail scam.. That CRSSRAIL cist is bad for the rest of the economy just as it is for the overall transport needs of London people…[To be continued]
View HERE today's [Thursday 17 January 2008] anger against CRASSRail is being expressed in Wigan



By Muhammad Haque
1408 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 17 January 2008

View HERE today's reporting of the CRASSrail costs overruns as pub shed by the Times, London, newspaper group



By Muhammad Haque
1400 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 17 January 2008
CRASSrail hole plot-backer London FT confesses to having lied in the time before Gordon Brown ‘made the announcement about the public funding of the’ CRASS ‘rail’ scheme. View HERE the ‘news’ report as published by the London 'FT' [='Financial Times'] today, Thursday 17 January 2008, making confession to the lies and also vindicating – [without ever wanting to; to want to d so would show that they were ethically able to recognise the truth or to support the truthful campaign]- what the Khoodeelaar! analysis has always maintained: that the claim, as made by the pluggers of the CRASSRail project to the effect that it, CRASSrail, would bring ‘benefits’ to areas like the East London borough of Tower Hamlets was a multi-layered, poisonous, corrupting, criminally negligent untruth of indescribable social irresponsibility

[To be continued]




CLICK HERE to view the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, INCLUDING the updated texts of the summary of the Khoodeelaar! CONSTITUTIONAL LAW objections being put to the UK House of Lords against the purpose, against the promotion, against the contents and against the procedures attached to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK Parliament [as has been evident in the behaviour of the holder of the post of Secretary of State – UK cabinet Minister - for Transport since February 2005] and as has been evident in the behaviour of the corrupt unconstitutional, unethical, prejudiced, spiteful, ignorant, time-serving bureaucracy that was in control of the pathetic, the parasitical, the undignified ‘CrossRail Bill; ‘select committee’ ‘of MPs [more later on that disgraceful episode at the behest of the Big Business-linked Tony Blaired UK Govt administration used by Big Business to promote Crossrail as the cover to loot the UK public ] comments and legal updates on the CURRENT Khoodeelaar! Campaign Action against the Crossrail hole plot. ……
Poverty of the Blairing assault by Gordon Brown on the inner city East End of London - New feature here soon

Poverty of the ‘Tower Hamlets schools performance propaganda’ - New feature here soon

Other web sites and web pages that regularly carry the AADHIKARonline contents include [as at 1045 Hrs GMT on Thursday 17 January [ 2008]

www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
www.khoodeelaar.com
and
khoodeelaar.wordpress.com

Today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] editions of AADHIKARonline and the related web sites jointly publishing the arguments and the moral, the democratic, the social and the constitutional defence of the inner city East End of London against the CRASSrail hole project being pushed through the UK Houses of Parliament by a morally compromised Gordon Brown - will include the Muhammad Haque daily world ethicality commentary examining the rising tide of corrupt and lack of morality in the behaviour of the Gordon Brown ‘administration'’.
why Gordon brown must behave in transparently honest and accountable and constitutional manner and move to scrap the CRASSrail hole bill
why the liars fur CrossRail – as being exposed in effect via the big business-linked ‘construction industry professionals’ [see the reports in the ft and the times newspapers, today, Thursday 17 January 2008] should be asked to resign al the publicly paid for posts and positions that they hold or are seeking to hold

How Peter Hain’s allegedly unique imbroglio is in fact and on the facts part and parcel of the corruption that is endemic in the Britain that Gordon Brown so ridiculously boasts about.
When Brown imperiously utters the imperialistic slogans and couches them all in his even more ridiculously irrelevant and inappropriate phrase pronounced in his ridiculously placed and contrived pr-racist accent as British vah-loos’ does he do that in the knowledge that right across the inner cities in the UK ‘mainland’ where most of the impoverished people ‘live’, there are cabals of Blair-praising, Gordon Brown-applauding careerists, little time servers and propagandists that are funded under various corrupting UK state schemes and that these cabals are there only to be used to keep the largest numbers of the deprived, the impoverished under control? And that he, Gurdon Brown ‘knows’ that these cabals are made up of exhibition-standard ethnicity-linked surrogates, ethnic surrogates who will be put on parade whenever the thrust of the new Discrimination, the newel inequality that Brown is plotting is felt by the majority of the targeted people in the inner cities? Does he, Gordon Brown, mean the likes that the beleaguered ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone has been wheeling out at regular publicity intervals recently? Does Brown also feel ‘assured’ that the likes of the state-sponsored agents of racism in Britain today, as personified and typified by Trevor the Terrible P-lips, will serve en as the couriers of corruption that Gordon Brown wants to infect the ordinary people across the inner cities with?
[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque questions BBC TV plug for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone, today


The dishonestly edited BBC ‘London’ news TV programme is set to give Ken Livingstone yet another promotion at the scheduled broadcast of a propaganda ‘interview’ at 1830 Hrs GMT today.
Khoodeelaar! Is telling the programme’s ‘political editor’ Tim Donovan to distance himself from the sleaze-ball Ken Livingstone-accommodating BBC agenda and actually use the available evidence of misconduct, misuse of office and powers and give Livingstone a serous interrogation.

Will Donovan do it?
Will Donovan be allowed by the corrupt BBC
executives to do it?

CROSSRAIL hole GHOSTS haunting Whitechapel in the early hours of Monday morning !
CROSSRAIL hole-plotters’ ghastly self-promotion and photo opportunity near the GHOST Bus service heading for Whitechapel! – And how the ‘local’ ‘independent’ ‘newspaper’ the East London Idiotiser aids and abets the CRASSRail hole plot-backing trio of John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim F.Patrick ! – Part 1

the ‘East London Idiotiser’ behaves in typically idiotic fashion when it manages to spend time and resource in promoting the petty careeristic agenda of not one but as many as three CrossRail hole plot-backers against the east end of London. And the idiotic ‘newspaper’ fails to mention the CRASSRail plot in an over-lengthy piece that it then parades on its equally ignorantly-‘edited’ web site. The task of getting the spin by the CrossRail hole three is first undertaken by another web site and by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole plot..

With ‘journalism’ like that as displayed by the ‘East London Idiotiser’ there is no way that the community in the East End of London can get the vital information and reporting service we deserve if we are to be able to defend ourselves against the Big Business-dictated, US-multi-national-Bechtel-lobby-created agenda being carried out by the East London-derived ‘public offices’ being held disrespectfully by John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim OF Patrick


[To be continued]


On 10 January 2008, the London Times newspaper published another economics-related comment on the ‘CrossRail’ ‘scheme’. Although a promotional piece, it still contained enough evidence of the lack of merit in the present CrossRail 'scheme'. From an economic standpoint. The author of the times piece had previously written on CrossRail far more critically. That was in September 2007. On that occasion, Khoodeelaar! Had analysed the published position of the times newspaper and in the time since then, several items have been published on the times web site as stated by Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad haque. Most of those comments have been about – and against - the breaches by the CrossRail hole plot-backer [Blaired-Brown] government of the uk’s constitutional obligations Click here to view on the London Times newspaper web site the comprehensive texts of Muhammad Haque's findings and the interpretation of the unconstitutional behaviour by the UK Government so far in pushing the Crossrail hole Bill through the two 'houses of parliament'


By©Muhammad Haque
1000 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 January 2008
A London community denounces ‘CrossRail station’ plans truly awful. Why are the plans being denounced as awful? Because of the lies that the CrossRail hole plot backer local council told in justifying its collusion with The Crossrail hole plot… but the lying council on this occasion - significant this - is not tower hamlets. Just like tower hamlets council though. That one is across the river in south London. Khoodeelaar! Will be publishing another updated exposition of the lies that local councils have been telling to and against the communities in the ‘councils’ ‘areas’ and affected by the CRASSRail hole plot activities… click here to view the news of people AGAINST CrossRail in south London

Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill - the constitutional law Ground-Part 10



Khoodeelaar! Interpretation of the UK ‘constitution’ By©Muhammad Haque
0820 Hrs GMT
London

Monday 14 January 2008 The assertion made to Parliament [the House of Commons] By the Secretary of State’ that the ‘CrossRail Bill’ was ‘compatible’ with the European Conventions, has been Untrue.
The Conventions have been violated by the Secretary of State at every Crucial point.

The Secretary of State as the ‘promoter’ of the CRASSRail Scam [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in its various forms to date] in Parliament has also breached the UK’s Human Rights Act And the Freedom of Information Act AS PART OF and in The process of the breaches of the ECHR.
Among other UK statutory and common law obligations in The context of the ECHR.
The breaches have not been either warranted by or related To or precipitated by any evidentially rationally, legally, Constitutionally and truthfully and fairly and justly and Transparently and ethically conceivable ground that any UK Secretary of State can advance [or could have advanced in The period since the actual ‘CrossRail Bill’ was introduced Into the UK parliament] in justifying any actual or Notionally exercisable or available ‘right to the specific Derogation’ from the UK’s Treaty obligations.
[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque daily constitutional law commentary – on the urgent need for the ‘House of Lords’, the UK Upper chamber in Parliament, to wake up and hood the Government to account. The 'House of Lords' could make a start by rigorously scrutinizing the ‘Crossrail Bill’ and its purpose and its implications…


1630 Hrs GMT London
Sunday 13 January 2008:
The role of the ‘Upper chamber’ [the House of Lords] [in the Uk parliament] is often not even mentioned, let alone recognised. Yet it could be a significant alternative to the servility of the House of Commons. Now, isn’t that a prospect! If only we had members in the Upper Chamber actually prepared to speak out on issues that matter. If we had the House of Lords really holding the ‘executive' to account by way of subjecting the CrossRail Bill to the kind of rigorous examination that the Bill actually warrants but has been allowed to escape in the House of Commons

To be continued

Earlier on Sunday 13 January 2008:

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN Organiser Muhammad Haque published the latest challenge to ‘London mayor election’ [scheduled to be held on 1 May 2008] ‘candidate’ Brian Paddick to state how he, Brian Paddick, would do anything AGAINST Crossrail when his ‘party’ [The Liberal Democrats] were ALL for the CrossRail scheme

By©Muhammad Haque 1135 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 January 2008 “Given that there is a belated awareness in some sections of the ‘mainstream’ media of the need to hold the holder of the post of ‘mayor of London’ to account and given that Mr Paddick himself evaluates his own position as being in many ways unique - relying as he does on the fact of his police career – and most importantly, given his public disagreement with the current commissioner of police on a number of issues all to do with points of principle, isn’t it incumbent on Mr Paddick to explain why he has contradicted so many of his ‘party’s’ ’spokespersons’ on Crossrail and how, in this context he thinks he can carry out any policies that counter the position of his ‘party’ in the conceptual eventuality of his getting elected ‘mayor of London’?”

[To be continued]

<

Jus how widespread has been the LYING and the misconduct by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council? Has the Khoodeelaar! Campaign been ‘exaggerating’ in any way in whatever we have been saying [now for the past 4 years] about the role,. The behaviour of the controlling clique on the Crossrail hole-peddling Tower Hamlets Council? Khoodeelaar! Has established a unique library of original work encompassing ALL aspects of the Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council. So unique and politically significant that our work is now recognised internationally. Khoodeelaar! Has been recognised - that is known as a reliable source of informed commentary about the state of Gordon Brown’s 'Britain' - now as being one of the most widely known and constitutionally active campaigns in the UK.. We show new evidence constituting the ground on which Khoodeelaar! Is internationally recognised.... … We show that Owen Whalley, the employee who has been placed in the role of operating the controlling clique's Blairising [that word, ‘Blairising’ has been just devised and used here for the first time, in this edition of the AADHIKARonline, at 1103 Hrs GMT Sunday 13 January 2008 –] agenda of INVITING the Crossrail hole problems upon the East End of London community, has been left out to dry, as it were, by the controlling clique… Because 'unknown' = allegedly, as we do not have reason to believe what Mr Whalley says either] to Whalley, the others, his ‘political controllers’ on the corrupt Council, KNOW and have known for a long while, that they have been BLOCKING Khoodeelaar! Communications to the corrupt Council…. Just as the ‘lead’ ! Member for degeneration was left out to rot in a limbo – but Khoodeelaar! Has been typically generous and has not taken the bait to annihilate the career of that pathetically misplaced ‘lead member’. So has Owen Whalley…. [To be continued]


Constitutional law commentary and report By©Muhammad Haque

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, organised in defence of the community in the East End of London, continuing to publish today Friday 11 January 2008 the comprehensive list of updated grounds against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the UK Parliament's ‘upper chamber’ the ‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’] , including the exposition where relevant of the unconstitutional behaviour and dishonesty by the agents, the post-holders and the touts operating in the name of the community and installed in the 'public' bodies and groups, ‘platforms and forums including the following
the ‘Greater London Authority’
the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
the Parliamentary constituencies of Bethnal Green and Bow and Poplar and Lime house/Poplar and Canning Town [whichever description of that constituency is appropriate, relevant and valid - this is a reference to the Boundary Commission's activities]
the CLRL company
Transport For London [=tfl]
The Department for Transport [=DfT]
the House of Commons ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ and its bureaucracy
The House of Commons ‘Sergeant at Arms’
the House of Commons 'Speaker's Secretariat and office



London CrossRail hole-plot-backer minister tom Harris and his DfT boss Ruth Kelly are exposed as being untenable. As is the big business agent in the house of lords j valentine… in a comment published today [Thursday 10 January 2008] by a blogger from Manchester [more on the guardian’s role, later] CLICK HERE to view a pdf version of the blog

By©Muhammad haque 2050 hrs GMT
London
Thursday
10 January 2008

How is it possible that Churning fake News [=’Channel Four News’] has been able to flaunt both the Crossrail hole plot-tout Ken Livingstone and the universally guilty Tony Blair among the ‘short listed’ for political awards? Time to scrap Jon ‘Slow’ Snow and his corrupting Churning Fake News programme


Whenever channel four news boasts about itself, it flaunts the face of Jon ‘slow’ Snow, as if his image is somehow synonymous with ‘accuracy, immediacy, relevance, integrity, accountability, transparency, truthfulness, courage, investigation and ethics and morality…’!
Or may be they flaunt his face in idle ignorance of any of the above criteria, which I attach to what should be a news programme on a ‘channel that I helped to found’! The truth of the matter is that I had feared that the ‘much-needed fourth TV channel’ that we were arguing for in the 1970s, might turn out to be yet another corrupting TV outlet for the organised gangs of crooks that wear ties and brag about their having 'gone to' the same gangster schools called ‘public’ schools and so on…
It was inevitable that I had to start campaigning again - almost immediately after Channel Four began broadcasting at the beginning of the 1980s - against the criminals that the [fourth] channel began to employ In the 25 years or so since the corrupting channel came to being, things have not got better as far as the peoples’ right to have truthful TV station or programme is concerned. Channel 4 in fact became identified as the Porn Channel and as if to prove that the BBC was no better than the Brothelliser, Corrupting corporation, the discredited, lying outfit then hired Michael Grade, ‘the Pornographer in chief' [as the Daily Mail was able to label him] as the BBC’s 'salvaging chairman!
How the criminals have prevailed…
To a point that this evening [Thursday 10 January 2008], the ghastly ‘news’ programme featured ken the CrossRail hole plot-tout as one of the 'Channel 4 News programme's ‘short listed’ political awards nominees! Including none other than Tony Bliar himself shown as being a ‘nominee’ for the award covering an entire decade….
And this on the very day when news broke of Blair’s having been employed by yet another war-mongering, pro-nukes outfit, paying Bliar a reported one million dollar per year for a few minutes’ presence on their board a month….. What c4 news should have concentrated on, instead of parading the Bliar as if he had done no harm to the world. Here was a man who took part in the causing of and in the justifying of the murders of uncounted numbers of innocent people in Asia ….. And Jon slow was parading Bliar as the first face on the so-called short-listed 6….
If Gordon brown had not unintentionally exposed ofcom [in the past few days] as the corrupt outfit that ofcom itself is [brown hired as his spin doctor OFCOM’s former boss], I would almost certainly have called for ofcom to investigate the churning fake news itself!
No wonder that when Jon slow began to ‘interview’ john Hutton, Gordon brown’s nuclear minister, there was hardly any substance to the stock phrases that slow included in his routine… [to be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0520 Hrs GMT
LondonThursday 10 January 2008

Big Business Crossrail hole plot is CrossRail. Now it is getting to be derided as if it is CURSED rail!
As if the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone’s insidious scheme is a measure of serious flaws in the very thinking, the very manoeuvring of the once ‘prudent’ ‘economics’ man Gordon Brown
That is the view of one writer published this morning by the Daily Telegraph group in London. Ineptitude is what Gordon Brown is being accused of. And excess costs. Linked with CrossRail. The writer says there is a much better and more economic solution available ….as compared with the costs and the irrelevance of CrossRail!


To be continued

The MUHAMMAD HAQUE daily world ethical commentary
1200 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 8 January 2008


Coming later on today [8 January 2008] in the Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary on Gordon Brown the examination of the following aspects of the uk premier who has already given the phrase ‘British vah-loos’ a precariously dubious identity….
How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to attack the people pushed into involuntary poverty and deprivation BY Brown’s own administration? How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to maintain discrimination and violate the ethical aspects of peoples’ rights while deriding the targeted people undergoing these assaults for not showing enough initiative? What initiatives does Gordon Brown in office at no 10 Downing Street, recognise as being consistent with his appreciation of ‘British vah-loos’? How is it that there are increasing numbers of ‘British’ people who are being pushed into rotting existence due to the failures of the state, the failures which Brown has been significantly reluctant to see in time ? Or see at all? How can Brown claim to know what any ‘vah-loos’ are when he is the prime minister who has been found with no acceptable explanation for the financial disasters that have come to light, not to speak of the robbery of peoples’ privacy contrary to their universal human rights? [to be continued]

How is it that so many items of evidence in Gordon Brown’s behaviour since he officially assumed the tenancy at No 10 Downing Street London SW1 in 2007 have been cited by the entire spectrum of ‘mainstream media commentators’ to support their derisive conclusive about Brown’s competence [etc] and not one of those items has been acknowledged as being remotely to do with Brown’s clouded collusion with the CRASSRail hole plotter Ken Livingstone? How long before these commentators agree with an echo the Khoodeelaar! Dissection of Gordon Brown’s seriously ill-advised and unjustifiable hype for the Big Business CRASSRail? And does Gordon Brown really understand the implications of What he is desperately letting himself in for? I mean, does Gordon Brown really have the democratic ability or the moral legitimacy to really take on people who care about and selflessly defend the environment?


[To be continued]



Muhammad Haque daily commentary
1350 Hrs GMT London Sunday 6 January 2008



’Difficult decisions! ‘Tough year 2008’! Gordon Brown again promoted Andrew Maar to the de facto post of a platform, which should have belonged in the Houses of parliament. And Brown should have been subjected to the overdue scrutiny on each and every single one of his assertions as he made those to the undeserved promotion of Andrew Maar and the BBC. That post would have existed if we had an accountable, assertive Parliament in the UK. Gordon Brown is abusing the position of Prime Minister just in the same way that Tony Blair did. And the abuse is going to get worse during this year. Appearing on the Andrew Marr Show, which is in fact the courier of the same baggage and garbage of propaganda that was stinkingly foisted on the viewing public/people with the over-oiled face of David Frost.. It is clear that if there has been any change after Frost vacated that slot which now flaunts Andrew Maar as the occupant] it has been for the worse. Gordon Brown has been able to make utterances on it that no self-resetting 'national' [meaning central UK] constituency in a 'world class' [!!! More on that crass slogan so fanatically promoted by Brown's 'new mate' the 'undone mayor' Ken Livingstone] should put up with from such a facile and banal occupier of No 10 Downing Street… His courtiers may not have told Gordon Brown this yet. But he is in danger of becoming ridiculously incredible unless he stops making these appearances.. I am going to do the scrutiny of four of his key utterances as made via the Andrew Marr embarrassment called the interview..


[To be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque
1148 Hrs GMT
London Friday 4 January 2008

On Tuesday 8 January 2008, Khoodeelaar! Will put to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the summarised version of the key objections to the contents and the purpose of the Bill. We shall do so in the knowledge of the ‘guidelines’ already published by the bureaucracy of the House of Lords concerning the objections and the remits. We shall be doing s in accordance with the UK’s constitutional obligations to afford due and full contents and evidence of the objections to be presented to the UK Parliament against the CrossRail Bill. Throughout the period of the House of Lords committee’s ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ we shall be publishing every day appropriate additional updates, news reports and constitutional law commentaries here and on other related Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill CAMPAIGN web sites, blogs and other internet and electronic platforms.
For the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, comments and legal updates on the Khoodeelaar! Action against the Crossrail hole plot, CLICK HERE.


Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign against the London Crossrail hole plot Bill [the draft piece of legislation – a hybrid Bill, called the ‘CrossRail Bill’ - that is now being moved through the UK houses of parliament at the behest of Big Business interests prevailing over Gordon Brown’s administration. The Big Business lobby is set to loot UK ordinary peoples' money - we distinguish between 'taxpayers' money and the peoples' money - more on this at a later edition]. Khoodeelaar! Is a Seelotee [< ‘Sylhetti’ < ‘Sylhet’] language word devised by Muhammad Haque in the East End of London, to signify the defence against and to denote the destructive agenda by big business that has been afoot under covers of plots like the Crossrail hole scam. Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign that has created a new and current foundation of argument based on the evidence that is universally independently objectively verifiable. The arguments are at once revenant to the east end of London as we as to the rest of the inner cities UK. By accessible extension, the arguments are as valid in the east end of London as they are in those parts of other ‘western’ cities where income and social disparity are the essential ingredients of the [classic] capitalist [and its variants that are manifest in the local forms, mechanisms and scams of ] exploitation regimes. Khoodeelaar! Is currently preparing a series of constitutional law representations against the contents and the purpose of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ …that constitutional law campaign by Khoodeelaar! Defending the community in the East End of London begins in the first week of January 2008. Visit this and associated web sites to stay in touch with that stage of the universal and the historic campaign for the upholding of the rights of the people of the east End of London – and by extension of the advocacy in principle of those of the rights of all the pressurized, violated, disenfranchised destitute peoples in the UK inner cities and of the other parts of the world- and for the voicing of the rights in principle of the vast majority whose voices are not heard in the UK parliament... If with no complete success in getting the ‘select committee in the UK Parliament’s Upper Chamber [the ‘House of Lords’] to agree with our aims ….
for the records
Records that we shall be relying on and referring to at the next level and stage of our campaign which will be taken before the European judicial and constitutional platforms

Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary on Gordon Brown's UK - here next

Hypertext links from this site may not be available

Try to log on to the following web sites for further info and updates

www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.khoodeelaar.wordpress.com
uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html

Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against Big Business Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘upper chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

For the LATEST NEWS, information and commentary visit

www.khoodeelaar.wordpress.com

CLICK HERE For the LATEST NEWS, information and commentary ......And to view the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, INCLUDING the updated texts of the summary of the Khoodeelaar! CONSTITUTIONAL LAW objections being put to the UK House of Lords against the purpose, against the promotion, against the contents and against the procedures attached to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as those have been created, applied and followed in the UK Parliament …

ALL materials as published here [except those that we occasionally refer to and quote from external sources - the sources are clearly identified and their authorship/s is/are acknowledged] are originally conceived, researched, written and edited. The fact that they are published for 'free' access via the internet must not be confused with their being legally and ethical and moray unprotected. The materials are NOT to be reprinted or re-published in any form except with the full legal and IPR statements as published by the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and the Editor being also included in full.
For legal permission and details, send your request in full in an e-mail to
aadhikarlaw@yahoo.co.uk

This should be done before any assumption of consent, permission or agreement

This the 3rd Edition of the day of the AADHIKARonline London UK was updated at 1030 Hrs GMT on Sunday 27 January 2008
This web site is being brought to you by AADHIKAR Media Foundation supporting Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney, London E1 area, UK, campaign against the Big Business-dictated Crossrail hole plot [as contained in the current ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the ‘upper chamber’ of the UK Parliament] against the East End of London.

[More info later]




From©Muhammad Haque
To
Editor in Chief online.editor@timesonline.co.uk


Is it too much to ask Gordon brown to practise compliance with the rules of constitutionality?
Or is Gordon Brown afraid that constitutionality will expose the shallowness, the waste and the unsustainability contained in the unwanted and the damaging schemes he appears intent on pushing through the unaccountably whipped Houses of the UK parliament?
The seriously flawed Department for Transport [DfT] is the only UK central Govt department that fell foul of its comprehensive constitutional obligations in a very big way more than 20 years ago.
Two decades on, the DfT seems to be being run by the same types of wrong headed, unconstitutional interests that had displayed Govt disregard for constitutional standards that the same Govt otherwise preaches and flaunts.
The DfT has been misleading the public and abusing executive influence over a cowed parliament [that is permanently whipped to let big business agenda through without practically any scrutiny] to push thorough a most empty scheme like Crossrail. Those of us opposing the seriously flawed 'Crossrail Bill' [now in the UK house of lords, the upper chamber] have been asking the DfT for the past four years to behave constitutionally. We have found that the Govt is not interested in actually observing its constitutional obligations on transport.
This is why we are preparing to mount legal challenges to the DfT [=UK Govt] as soon as the pro-Crossrail Bill-whipped formalities are over in the UK House of lords about the 'Crossrail Bill'.
Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ CAMPAIGN
0100 Hrs
London
Sunday 27 January 2008


By©Muhammad Haque
2050 Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 January 2008

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole plot [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it is currently in the UK ‘House of Lords’ – the ‘upper chamber’ in the UK parliament] CAMPAIGN Manifesto for London 2008 – the next parts due here during this weekend.


By©Muhammad Haque

1440 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 January 2008:


After Peter Hain’s resignation, it is not tenable for Gordon Brown to say that his administration is made of only truth-tellers … get Ruth Kelly to tell the truth about the CrossRail hole plot



coming here shortly


KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - advising Gordon Brown in the hour after Peter Hain's resignation news breaks, that he, Brown should scrap the CRASSrail hole plot Bill in its present form...


Khoodeelaar! defending the community in the East End of London, situated in the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’ which is described by independently active students of in income disparity [=inequality] , social exclusion and discrimination and deprivation in the UK today, as being either one of the or the most deprived inner city area in all of England .. Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown that he should scrap the attacks on the East End of London and on other counties across London that are still contained in the seriously flawed and wasteful ‘CrossRail Bill’ scheme– in the wake of the announcement in the past hour [time calculated at 1410 Hrs GMT 24 January 2008] of the much-anticipated resignation by Peter Hain from Gordon Brown’s cabinet, Khoodeelaar! Says to Gordon Brown – STOP being arrogant in showing your backing for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone.. Start telling the truth about the really pernicious elements that have pushed you into the corner where you had to make the bold but evidentially and objectively unjustifiable utterances fir the CRASSrail project. Listen to the people and you will stay in office… If you dismiss the people who are telling the truth and if you continue to go down the road of hypocrisy, spin and contradictions and if you get addicted to preferring to listen to those who bid you to rely on the courtiers and sycophants like Steve STUPID Richards of the ‘Independent’ then you will find that you are lacking in essential legitimacy to remain in office… This is not a threat, Gordon.. This is a warning that all truthful observers of your time so far in office at 'Number 10 Downing Street' will want you to pay attention to …Khoodeelaar!…continuing to show up the unconstitutionality of conduct by the UK Govt that is being used as a tool for Big Business to loot the UK public under the misleading covers of the London CrossRail hole project….


[To be continued]


CROSSRAIL hole-plotter “undone mayor” Ken Livingstone has been defended [!!!] by Darcus Howe. As he has been by the weekly Vice [Oops! ‘Voice’ ‘newspaper’].
Darcus Howe is also confessing to treating with equal respectfulness the one-time ‘Labour Party Black Section’ –banner-flaunting self-seekers Keith Vaz and Diane Abbott [1983-87] [1987 was the ‘general election’ which let those two into the CORRUPTING House of Commons as ‘Labour Party ETHNIC MPs’ along with the late Bernie Grant and the unlamented Paul Boateng].
There is no evidence that ANY SINGLE ONE of the ethnicity-linked time servers in either the House of Commons or in the even more corruptly appointed and installed 'House of Lords' has justified any hype attaching to their ‘appointments’ – none of them has shown any consistent or memorable or mentionable parliamentary democratic or ethical integrity let alone independence of mind or thought in any field and in any debate or on any issue that really matters in the context of the so-called black or ethnic representation in the UK parliament
I say 'so-called'!
Why? I shall give the criteria and description and justification for saying that. Before I do that, questions must be asked. The first questions include these:

What does Darcus Howe know that those who have apparently questioned Ken LYINGSTILL Livingstone’s integrity don’t know? What does Darcus Howe have as demonstrable evidence of his ‘career’ that is made up of ‘giving up personal gains for the sake of the collective society’? Has Darcus Howe EVER published the facts of any such? OTHER than the hypes that he fomented at the expense of un-named black people who really made the main sacrifices at both the Notting Hill battles and at Lewisham?
Has Darcus Howe been given the platform on the NewSS [=’New Statesman and `Society’ – now reverted back to ‘New Statesman’] because of the 'integrity' of Howe's 'character' and 'actions' before he was able to qualify for the Lyinsgtill's ‘Freedom Pass’ that he [Howe] has been exhibiting in ‘substantiation’ of his overly pretentious presumption that his statement [carried, ironically in the NEW SS website and publication - the same one that has Martin Bright as its 'political editor'] of support for Ken Livingstone amounts to something so significant that no other member of the ‘black’ population in the UK can universally verifiably claim to lend to THEIR opinion or views on the matter?



[To be continued]
1035 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 January 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole Bill' [the 'Crossrail Bill’ as is in the UK ‘House of Lords’ now] CAMPAIGN - continuing to update the UK House of Lords [as the legislative ‘upper chamber’ of the UK parliament, now preparing to formally ‘consider’ the ‘CrossRail Bill’] on the record and the evidence showing the unconstitutionality of conduct by the main touts for Big Business CRASSRAIL scam...
We add to the already existent massive files on Ken Livingstone’s lying perpetrations for the CRASSrail hole scam. This analysis of Ken Livingstone’s irresponsible and careeristic fiction [below] one is taken from the website today [Wednesday 23 January 2008] of a money magazine that exposes Livingstone’s subsidiary lying project - Livingstone’s peddling of the London Olympics 2012 myths and hypes.


The magazine publishes the analysis from another source, named in the contents below, that exposes the immorality and the inaccuracy of Ken Livingstone's maths…..
His maths too are a myth…

" Ken's Olympic-sized miscalculation
23.01.2008
Here is a little mathematical conundrum for you. What number, if compounded at 6% per year, becomes 800m… but if compounded at 16% per year becomes worth 1.8bn? And how many years would this take? And if multiplied by 20% per year, would this number be 3bn?


These are some of the questions posed by recent revelations that, in order to pay for the Olympic Games, money will be ‘borrowed’ from the National Lottery Fund; to be repaid from land sales once the great sporting jamboree is over. Sorting through the tangled maze of last week’s statements on this matter it appears that the government needs to recoup £800m from land sales post 2012, in order, says Ken Livingstone ‘to repay all the debts that we have incurred.’ I wonder whether this includes interest on the borrowed money? Somehow I doubt it.


This figure, described as ‘conservative’ – I’ll come to this in a moment! – assumes 6% annual appreciation of the value of the land. Ken, though, reckons that the sale of land is more likely to bring in £1.8bn. This is based on annual appreciation of 16% per year, a figure that should have every investor rushing to Stratford, but which is bizarrely described by Ken as ‘quite cautious’.




We can derive from these calculations that the land is presently worth about £470m. But to confuse the matter still further the London Mayor's director of planning and regeneration, Neale Coleman told the Commons’ Culture, Media and Sports Committee that ‘using the average land price inflation of 19% over the last 20 years, the LDA could make £3billion.’


This cannot be the case. If the land is now worth £470m then 19% annual appreciation takes its value to £2.3bn. You would need 23% annual appreciation before you got £3bn.


This little political spat raises all sorts of questions, of which whether or not Ken Livingstone and his henchmen can do maths is the least important. The two big questions are: what is conservative? And, is the past any guide to the future?



A 'conservative' consumption?
The so-called conservative assumption that the value of land in the Stratford region of East London will grow at ‘only’ 6% per year is based on the fact that this apparently was the appreciation recorded in the worst year of the last twenty.
That may be true, but anybody who assumes that the value of anything will appreciate above the rate of inflation and above the level of long-term interest rates is, at the very least, not allowing for the possibility that something could go wrong. This has echoes of Northern Rock, whose chief executive Adam Applegarth said that its business strategy worked very well ‘until the credit crunch came along’.
The reason that we conservatively put a roof on top of our houses is because we cannot be sure that the sun will always shine. That is conservatism. Was the possibility of a recession between now and 2012 not considered? Or was the possibility that there might be a hiccough in the property bull market conveniently forgotten in the urgency of siphoning off the Lottery money?
Did it not strike anyone that 6% per annum is actually quite a high figure? And that Ken’s ‘quite cautious’ 18% is just fantastic? The justification is the apparent 20% or so annual rise in land values in the area over the last twenty years. But might this not have been because land values in Stratford have been bid up in anticipation of the Olympic effect? For sure, this has been the case.
Taking London as a whole, the price of a hectare of land has risen from £759,000 in 1983 to £5.5m now. That represents an annual rise of less than 9%. So Stratford has already far outpaced the capital. Is this because Stratford is a wonderfully attractive place to live? Or could it be because several sharp property speculators have seen the Olympics cruising into view and have been busy buying up land in anticipation?
I think you know the answer to that. So will land values in Stratford rise by 6% per year, allowing the Lottery Fund to get its money back? Perhaps – but it is by no means certain. Will land values continue to rise at 16%, or 19% or 23% per annum. Not a hope! This article is taken from Tom Bulford's free daily email Penny Sleuth "


By©Muhammad Haque


1220 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 January 2008:
More than fifty persons in the East End of London have signed a new campaign declaration in a matter of four hours and reaffirmed their commitment against Crossrail hole. This is from one part of the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area where Khoodeelaar! Has been mobilising opposition against the CrossRail assault.
The local residents responded to Khoodeelaar! Campaign information that the current procedural period to register opposition to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK House of Lords was due to end in a matter of days.
It is expected that more than 100 others will sign their commitment and back the Khoodeelaar! formal objections to the CrossRail Bill to be put to the House of Lords this week.
At a campaign meeting held in the Whitechapel area, new condemnation was made against the local Tower Hamlets Council for continuing to lie to the local community about the Council’s collusion for the CrossRail hole plot.
[To be continued]
[Texts from an earlier part of this Khoodeelaar! commentary by MUHAMMAD HAQUE and as published by Khoodeelaar! on the Internet today Monday 21 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! The East London Campaign against the ‘Crossrail hole plot’ [the ‘Crossrail Bill’] updating the publication of the evidential context for the demand being reiterated this week to the UK Parliament [‘house of lords] to scrap the ‘Crossrail bill’ and to recommend that the transport needs of London and the relevant other parts of the country are addressed by the uk govt giving priority to what the transport needs of the ordinary public are, what the sustainable solution is…
Khoodeelaar! asks the UK House of Lords [the ‘upper chamber’ of parliament- which in practice is the ‘lower caber’…] to show that it is acing in its role on making UK legislation in a universally objectively describable constitutionally compatible manner and that it, the UK House of Lords is and active and rigorous, ethical, intelligent and up-to-date forum for the competent, truthful, honest and timely scrutiny of any legislative proposal. …….
Khoodeelaar! Question as put to the House of Lords this morning [Monday 21 January 2008] is in the context of the statement made by [Alistair Darling who at the time was] the Secretary of state for Transport as he introduced the ‘Crossrail Bill’ into the UK [lower chamber of parliament] House of Commons in February 2005. As he did so, the Secretary of State said that he was satisfied that the Bill was ‘compatible with the Convention’.
That was not true then.
That is not true now.
Because the ‘petitioning programme’ that is currently on about the objections against the Crossrail Bill [that is now in the House of lords] is being seriously restricted, the Khoodeelaar campaign is demanding to know how the House of lords can justify the restrictions and also claim that they are ding s by acting within the constitutional obligations
The following is quoted from the UK House of Lords administrative office guidance notes about petitioning against the Crossrail Bill.
The answer stated in the quoted part is in contravention of the ECHR.
"CAN I OBJECT TO THE BILL AS A WHOLE?
No.
The Committee will only be able to consider aspects of the project proposed in the bill, which affect people in their private capacity, not fundamental principles involving broader issues (such as whether a cross-London rail link should be constructed). Those issues are discussed and decided by the House of Lords itself (during a debate on the bill on the floor of the House of Lords).
The Committee cannot make recommendations on matters of principle nor do they have the power to reject the bill.
There is no point, therefore, in making political comments, raising general objections to the bill or in raising broad issues of policy in your petition, you should concentrate instead on the specific ways in which the bill directly and specially affects you or those you represent."

[To be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque


0800 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2008



Khoodeelaar! No to ‘Crossrail hole’ plot, No to ‘CRASS rail lies’ like ‘high speed link needed to Heathrow to keep London at the top of the league of world class cities’ - lies that Ken Livingstone has been uttering…


1. KHOODEELAAR! campaigners from the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 area set to ask NEW and UPDATED questions and put them to the [‘legislative’] UK House of Lords to demand that the promoter of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the ‘House of Lords’], the UK Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly [MP] produce immediately unambiguous evidence that there is economic justification, there is environmental justification for spending £Billions of public money for a project that is peddled by its peddlers at its ‘most justifiable’ to be one about RUSHING passengers to Heathrow airport and then depositing them into an airport of waiting, of waste, of congested contaminated desperation….
2. What is the point of Crossrail……
3. And other questions….
4. Khoodeelaar! SAYING NO to the congestion of lies by CRASSRail hole-plot backer Ken Livingstone…
5. Those lies can no longer be ignored by the ‘mainstream’…
6. The lies that they told in the ‘London’ ‘evening standard’ for Crossrail…
7. On the one hand the ‘evening standard’ and the lying CRASSRail hole-plotters denounced the ‘long hours, even days’ of waiting chaos at Heathrow and on the other and in almost the same breath they lied and said that CROSSRAIL was ‘vital’ to LINK with Heathrow…
8. Now, where do they propose to take the public once they RUSH them at high speed to Heathrow?
9. What happens when Heathrow is congested?
10. What is the point of the pointless CRASSrail then? ….
[To be continued]

The CURRENT campaign news, information and commentary being created for Khoodeelaar! By the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and published on the Internet is focussed on the CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. What is Khoodeelaar! doing to bring about compliance with the UK’s European Treaty obligations in the conduct of making laws in the UK. Khoodeelaar! is at once embarked on a multi-faceted programme of defence of the ordinary public in London and by extension across the UK against the illegal, unconstitutional, illegitimate behaviour on the part of the UK executive. As this week’s ‘comments’ in the ‘mainstream’ media in the UK has been about the near-disaster [that was, according to a number of news reports, averted only by a worrying 20 seconds!!!] at the Heathrow airport which reportedly occurred when Gordon Brown was in the vicinity, the Khoodeelaar! campaign is going to put appropriate legal and constitutional law emphasis on the demand that it has already put to Gordon Brown’s administration to show the evidence of uncorrupted correlation between the various claims that the Government has been making for the Big Business CrossRail hole plot. Of specific importance is the claim that has been made with insane fanaticism, and echoed by a Ken Livingstone-compromised Gordon Brown in the weeks and months between 1 October 2007 and 1 December 2007, to the effect that one of the most vital ECONOMIC arguments and justifications for Crossrail was that it would link up Heathrow airport with the rest of the ‘City of London’. Now that even Frank Field, MP [Birkenhead, England] [on the BBC Radio 4 programme 'Any Question' as broadcast on Friday 18 and Saturday 19 January 2008] has called Heathrow airport obsolete and assorted other commentators have been able to speak out against any plans to create another terminal at Heathrow airport, questions that Khoodeelaar! has already put to Ruth Kelly [the Current 'Crossrail hole plot-promoting UK Secretary of State at the Department for Transport'] will be updated and reinforced. 2007
Khoodeelaar! will show the constitutional law way forward for solving the genuine transport needs of London
Khoodeelaar! dissecting the language of CrossRail lies by Crossrail promoters
Khoodeelaar! evidence of constitutional and democratic questions as put to the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council – the past four years
Khoodeelaar! questions to the several relevant UK MPs
Khoodeelaar! questions to the office concerned in the UK House of Lords dealing with the House of Lords ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’
Khoodeelaar! diagnosis of the unconstitutionality of the behaviour of Ruth Kelly, Tom Harris and their co-ministers and post-holders in the uk Department for Transport
Khoodeelaar! invokes the ‘lessons’ of 1988 and the follies of the PRE-Crossrail UK Department for Transport and their THEN idiocies which exposed the UK Government of the day [Maggie Thatcher] to Europe-wide ridicule [ as based on the UK's Government’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL, unethical and dishonest behaviour] in a big way
Khoodeelaar! constitutional law updates against the drafting of, the proceedings about and the promotion of the current ‘Crossrail Bill’
Khoodeelaar! campaign updates
Khoodeelaar! breaking news



By Muhammad Haque
1410 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 17 January 2008
As I have been saying for the past almost eight years – since I came across a piece of paper issued by the CRASSrail hole plot-inviting clique in Tower Hamlets – the scheme would bring no benefits to the East End. It could not do so. What is more, the TRANSPORT needs of the UK as a whole or even those of ‘England and Wales’ [my phraseology is devolving here in ‘line’ with the ‘Scottish’ accent....] would not be addressed unless the entire schema was thoroughly revised by taking into truthful account all the factors involved. The KEY factor that I have been stressing ALL Along – and one which is the reason why I decided to label the ‘decision-making’ perpetrators as the ‘corrupt claque’ in control of the Tower Hamlets Council, is that of the deliberate policy of neglecting the ‘education’ of the children, the young people and the adults in the borough of Tower Hamlets… It is this particular one that today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] Times newspaper group website acknowledges in their presentation of the ‘findings’. The Wigan web site is also vindicating, in effect, what I have said and what I shall continue to say on the evidence and on the facts against the ghastly inappropriateness of the WASTEFUL Crossrail scam.. That CRSSRAIL cist is bad for the rest of the economy just as it is for the overall transport needs of London people…[To be continued]
View HERE today's [Thursday 17 January 2008] anger against CRASSRail is being expressed in Wigan



By Muhammad Haque
1408 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 17 January 2008

View HERE today's reporting of the CRASSrail costs overruns as pub shed by the Times, London, newspaper group



By Muhammad Haque
1400 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 17 January 2008
CRASSrail hole plot-backer London FT confesses to having lied in the time before Gordon Brown ‘made the announcement about the public funding of the’ CRASS ‘rail’ scheme. View HERE the ‘news’ report as published by the London 'FT' [='Financial Times'] today, Thursday 17 January 2008, making confession to the lies and also vindicating – [without ever wanting to; to want to d so would show that they were ethically able to recognise the truth or to support the truthful campaign]- what the Khoodeelaar! analysis has always maintained: that the claim, as made by the pluggers of the CRASSRail project to the effect that it, CRASSrail, would bring ‘benefits’ to areas like the East London borough of Tower Hamlets was a multi-layered, poisonous, corrupting, criminally negligent untruth of indescribable social irresponsibility

[To be continued]




CLICK HERE to view the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, INCLUDING the updated texts of the summary of the Khoodeelaar! CONSTITUTIONAL LAW objections being put to the UK House of Lords against the purpose, against the promotion, against the contents and against the procedures attached to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK Parliament [as has been evident in the behaviour of the holder of the post of Secretary of State – UK cabinet Minister - for Transport since February 2005] and as has been evident in the behaviour of the corrupt unconstitutional, unethical, prejudiced, spiteful, ignorant, time-serving bureaucracy that was in control of the pathetic, the parasitical, the undignified ‘CrossRail Bill; ‘select committee’ ‘of MPs [more later on that disgraceful episode at the behest of the Big Business-linked Tony Blaired UK Govt administration used by Big Business to promote Crossrail as the cover to loot the UK public ] comments and legal updates on the CURRENT Khoodeelaar! Campaign Action against the Crossrail hole plot. ……
Poverty of the Blairing assault by Gordon Brown on the inner city East End of London - New feature here soon

Poverty of the ‘Tower Hamlets schools performance propaganda’ - New feature here soon

Other web sites and web pages that regularly carry the AADHIKARonline contents include [as at 1045 Hrs GMT on Thursday 17 January [ 2008]

www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
www.khoodeelaar.com
and
khoodeelaar.wordpress.com

Today’s [Thursday 17 January 2008] editions of AADHIKARonline and the related web sites jointly publishing the arguments and the moral, the democratic, the social and the constitutional defence of the inner city East End of London against the CRASSrail hole project being pushed through the UK Houses of Parliament by a morally compromised Gordon Brown - will include the Muhammad Haque daily world ethicality commentary examining the rising tide of corrupt and lack of morality in the behaviour of the Gordon Brown ‘administration'’.
why Gordon brown must behave in transparently honest and accountable and constitutional manner and move to scrap the CRASSrail hole bill
why the liars fur CrossRail – as being exposed in effect via the big business-linked ‘construction industry professionals’ [see the reports in the ft and the times newspapers, today, Thursday 17 January 2008] should be asked to resign al the publicly paid for posts and positions that they hold or are seeking to hold

How Peter Hain’s allegedly unique imbroglio is in fact and on the facts part and parcel of the corruption that is endemic in the Britain that Gordon Brown so ridiculously boasts about.
When Brown imperiously utters the imperialistic slogans and couches them all in his even more ridiculously irrelevant and inappropriate phrase pronounced in his ridiculously placed and contrived pr-racist accent as British vah-loos’ does he do that in the knowledge that right across the inner cities in the UK ‘mainland’ where most of the impoverished people ‘live’, there are cabals of Blair-praising, Gordon Brown-applauding careerists, little time servers and propagandists that are funded under various corrupting UK state schemes and that these cabals are there only to be used to keep the largest numbers of the deprived, the impoverished under control? And that he, Gurdon Brown ‘knows’ that these cabals are made up of exhibition-standard ethnicity-linked surrogates, ethnic surrogates who will be put on parade whenever the thrust of the new Discrimination, the newel inequality that Brown is plotting is felt by the majority of the targeted people in the inner cities? Does he, Gordon Brown, mean the likes that the beleaguered ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone has been wheeling out at regular publicity intervals recently? Does Brown also feel ‘assured’ that the likes of the state-sponsored agents of racism in Britain today, as personified and typified by Trevor the Terrible P-lips, will serve en as the couriers of corruption that Gordon Brown wants to infect the ordinary people across the inner cities with?
[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque questions BBC TV plug for Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone, today


The dishonestly edited BBC ‘London’ news TV programme is set to give Ken Livingstone yet another promotion at the scheduled broadcast of a propaganda ‘interview’ at 1830 Hrs GMT today.
Khoodeelaar! Is telling the programme’s ‘political editor’ Tim Donovan to distance himself from the sleaze-ball Ken Livingstone-accommodating BBC agenda and actually use the available evidence of misconduct, misuse of office and powers and give Livingstone a serous interrogation.

Will Donovan do it?
Will Donovan be allowed by the corrupt BBC
executives to do it?

CROSSRAIL hole GHOSTS haunting Whitechapel in the early hours of Monday morning !
CROSSRAIL hole-plotters’ ghastly self-promotion and photo opportunity near the GHOST Bus service heading for Whitechapel! – And how the ‘local’ ‘independent’ ‘newspaper’ the East London Idiotiser aids and abets the CRASSRail hole plot-backing trio of John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim F.Patrick ! – Part 1

the east London Idiotiser’ behaves in typically idiotic fashion when it manages to spend time and resource in promoting the petty careeristic agenda of not one but as many as three CrossRail hole plot-backers against the east end of London. And the idiotic ‘newspaper’ fails to mention the CRASSRail plot in an over-lengthy piece that it then parades on its equally ignorantly-‘edited’ web site. The task of getting the spin by the CrossRail hole three is first undertaken by another web site and by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole plot..

with ‘journalism’ like that as displayed by the ‘East London Idiotiser. There is no way that the community in the East End can get the vital information and reporting service we deserve if we are to be able to defend ourselves against the Big Business-dictated, US-multi-national-Bechtel-lobby-created agenda being carried out by the East London-derived ‘public offices’ being held disrespectfully by John Biggs, Denise Jones and Jim OF Patrick


[To be continued]


On 10 January 2008, the London Times newspaper published another economics-related comment on the ‘CrossRail’ ‘scheme’. Although a promotional piece, it still contained enough evidence of the lack of merit in the present CrossRail 'scheme'. From an economic standpoint. The author of the times piece had previously written on CrossRail far more critically. That was in September 2007. On that occasion, Khoodeelaar! Had analysed the published position of the times newspaper and in the time since then, several items have been published on the times web site as stated by Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad haque. Most of those comments have been about – and against - the breaches by the CrossRail hole plot-backer [Blaired-Brown] government of the uk’s constitutional obligations Click here to view on the London Times newspaper web site the comprehensive texts of Muhammad Haque's findings and the interpretation of the unconstitutional behaviour by the UK Government so far in pushing the Crossrail hole Bill through the two 'houses of parliament'


By©Muhammad Haque
1000 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 January 2008
A London community denounces ‘CrossRail station’ plans truly awful. Why are the plans being denounced as awful? Because of the lies that the CrossRail hole plot backer local council told in justifying its collusion with The Crossrail hole plot… but the lying council on this occasion - significant this - is not tower hamlets. Just like tower hamlets council though. That one is across the river in south London. Khoodeelaar! Will be publishing another updated exposition of the lies that local councils have been telling to and against the communities in the ‘councils’ ‘areas’ and affected by the CRASSRail hole plot activities… click here to view the news of people AGAINST CrossRail in south London

Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill - the constitutional law Ground-Part 10



Khoodeelaar! Interpretation of the UK ‘constitution’ By©Muhammad Haque
0820 Hrs GMT
London

Monday 14 January 2008 The assertion made to Parliament [the House of Commons] By the Secretary of State’ that the ‘CrossRail Bill’ was ‘compatible’ with the European Conventions, has been Untrue.
The Conventions have been violated by the Secretary of State at every Crucial point.

The Secretary of State as the ‘promoter’ of the CRASSRail Scam [the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in its various forms to date] in Parliament has also breached the UK’s Human Rights Act And the Freedom of Information Act AS PART OF and in The process of the breaches of the ECHR.
Among other UK statutory and common law obligations in The context of the ECHR.
The breaches have not been either warranted by or related To or precipitated by any evidentially rationally, legally, Constitutionally and truthfully and fairly and justly and Transparently and ethically conceivable ground that any UK Secretary of State can advance [or could have advanced in The period since the actual ‘CrossRail Bill’ was introduced Into the UK parliament] in justifying any actual or Notionally exercisable or available ‘right to the specific Derogation’ from the UK’s Treaty obligations.
[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque daily constitutional law commentary – on the urgent need for the ‘House of Lords’, the UK Upper chamber in Parliament, to wake up and hood the Government to account. The 'House of Lords' could make a start by rigorously scrutinizing the ‘Crossrail Bill’ and its purpose and its implications…


1630 Hrs GMT London
Sunday 13 January 2008:
The role of the ‘Upper chamber’ [the House of Lords] [in the Uk parliament] is often not even mentioned, let alone recognised. Yet it could be a significant alternative to the servility of the House of Commons. Now, isn’t that a prospect! If only we had members in the Upper Chamber actually prepared to speak out on issues that matter. If we had the House of Lords really holding the ‘executive' to account by way of subjecting the CrossRail Bill to the kind of rigorous examination that the Bill actually warrants but has been allowed to escape in the House of Commons

To be continued

Earlier on Sunday 13 January 2008:

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN Organiser Muhammad Haque published the latest challenge to ‘London mayor election’ [scheduled to be held on 1 May 2008] ‘candidate’ Brian Paddick to state how he, Brian Paddick, would do anything AGAINST Crossrail when his ‘party’ [The Liberal Democrats] were ALL for the CrossRail scheme

By©Muhammad Haque 1135 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 January 2008 “Given that there is a belated awareness in some sections of the ‘mainstream’ media of the need to hold the holder of the post of ‘mayor of London’ to account and given that Mr Paddick himself evaluates his own position as being in many ways unique - relying as he does on the fact of his police career – and most importantly, given his public disagreement with the current commissioner of police on a number of issues all to do with points of principle, isn’t it incumbent on Mr Paddick to explain why he has contradicted so many of his ‘party’s’ ’spokespersons’ on Crossrail and how, in this context he thinks he can carry out any policies that counter the position of his ‘party’ in the conceptual eventuality of his getting elected ‘mayor of London’?” [To be continued]

<

Jus how widespread has been the LYING and the misconduct by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council? Has the Khoodeelaar! Campaign been ‘exaggerating’ in any way in whatever we have been saying [now for the past 4 years] about the role,. The behaviour of the controlling clique on the Crossrail hole-peddling Tower Hamlets Council? Khoodeelaar! Has established a unique library of original work encompassing ALL aspects of the Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council. So unique and politically significant that our work is now recognised internationally. Khoodeelaar! Has been recognised - that is known as a reliable source of informed commentary about the state of Gordon Brown’s 'Britain' - now as being one of the most widely known and constitutionally active campaigns in the UK.. We show new evidence constituting the ground on which Khoodeelaar! Is internationally recognised.... … We show that Owen Whalley, the employee who has been placed in the role of operating the controlling clique's Blairising [that word, ‘Blairising’ has been just devised and used here for the first time, in this edition of the AADHIKARonline, at 1103 Hrs GMT Sunday 13 January 2008 –] agenda of INVITING the Crossrail hole problems upon the East End of London community, has been left out to dry, as it were, by the controlling clique… Because 'unknown' = allegedly, as we do not have reason to believe what Mr Whalley says either] to Whalley, the others, his ‘political controllers’ on the corrupt Council, KNOW and have known for a long while, that they have been BLOCKING Khoodeelaar! Communications to the corrupt Council…. Just as the ‘lead’ ! Member for degeneration was left out to rot in a limbo – but Khoodeelaar! Has been typically generous and has not taken the bait to annihilate the career of that pathetically misplaced ‘lead member’. So has Owen Whalley…. [To be continued]


Constitutional law commentary and report By©Muhammad Haque

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN, organised in defence of the community in the East End of London, continuing to publish today Friday 11 January 2008 the comprehensive list of updated grounds against the ‘Crossrail Bill’ [now in the UK Parliament's ‘upper chamber’ the ‘House of Lords’ at ‘Westminster’] , including the exposition where relevant of the unconstitutional behaviour and dishonesty by the agents, the post-holders and the touts operating in the name of the community and installed in the 'public' bodies and groups, ‘platforms and forums including the following
the ‘Greater London Authority’
the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
the Parliamentary constituencies of Bethnal Green and Bow and Poplar and Lime house/Poplar and Canning Town [whichever description of that constituency is appropriate, relevant and valid - this is a reference to the Boundary Commission's activities]
the CLRL company
Transport For London [=tfl]
The Department for Transport [=DfT]
the House of Commons ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ and its bureaucracy
The House of Commons ‘Sergeant at Arms’
the House of Commons 'Speaker's Secretariat and office



London CrossRail hole-plot-backer minister tom Harris and his DfT boss Ruth Kelly are exposed as being untenable. As is the big business agent in the House of Lords j valentine… in a comment published today [Thursday 10 January 2008] by a blogger from Manchester [more on the guardian’s role, later] CLICK HERE to view a pdf version of the blog

By©Muhammad haque 2050 hrs GMT
London
Thursday
10 January 2008

How is it possible that Churning fake News [=’Channel Four News’] has been able to flaunt both the Crossrail hole plot-tout Ken Livingstone and the universally guilty Tony Blair among the ‘short listed’ for political awards? Time to scrap Jon ‘Slow’ Snow and his corrupting Churning Fake News programme


Whenever channel four news boasts about itself, it flaunts the face of Jon ‘slow’ Snow, as if his image is somehow synonymous with ‘accuracy, immediacy, relevance, integrity, accountability, transparency, truthfulness, courage, investigation and ethics and morality…’!
Or may be they flaunt his face in idle ignorance of any of the above criteria, which I attach to what should be a news programme on a ‘channel that I helped to found’! The truth of the matter is that I had feared that the ‘much-needed fourth TV channel’ that we were arguing for in the 1970s, might turn out to be yet another corrupting TV outlet for the organised gangs of crooks that wear ties and brag about their having 'gone to' the same gangster schools called ‘public’ schools and so on…
It was inevitable that I had to start campaigning again - almost immediately after Channel Four began broadcasting at the beginning of the 1980s - against the criminals that the [fourth] channel began to employ In the 25 years or so since the corrupting channel came to being, things have not got better as far as the peoples’ right to have truthful TV station or programme is concerned. Channel 4 in fact became identified as the Porn Channel and as if to prove that the BBC was no better than the Brothelliser, Corrupting corporation, the discredited, lying outfit then hired Michael Grade, ‘the Pornographer in chief' [as the Daily Mail was able to label him] as the BBC’s 'salvaging chairman!
How the criminals have prevailed…
To a point that this evening [Thursday 10 January 2008], the ghastly ‘news’ programme featured ken the CrossRail hole plot-tout as one of the 'Channel 4 News programme's ‘short listed’ political awards nominees! Including none other than Tony Bliar himself shown as being a ‘nominee’ for the award covering an entire decade….
And this on the very day when news broke of Blair’s having been employed by yet another war-mongering, pro-nukes outfit, paying Bliar a reported one million dollar per year for a few minutes’ presence on their board a month….. What c4 news should have concentrated on, instead of parading the Bliar as if he had done no harm to the world. Here was a man who took part in the causing of and in the justifying of the murders of uncounted numbers of innocent people in Asia ….. And Jon slow was parading Bliar as the first face on the so-called short listed 6….
If Gordon brown had not unintentionally exposed ofcom [in the past few days] as the corrupt outfit that ofcom itself is [brown hired as his spin doctor OFCOM’s former boss], I would almost certainly have called for ofcom to investigate the churning fake news itself!
No wonder that when Jon slow began to ‘interview’ john Hutton, Gordon brown’s nuclear minister, there was hardly any substance to the stock phrases that slow included in his routine… [to be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0520 Hrs GMT
LondonThursday 10 January 2008

Big Business Crossrail hole plot is CrossRail. Now it is getting to be derided as if it is CURSED rail!
As if the ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone’s insidious scheme is a measure of serious flaws in the very thinking, the very manoeuvring of the once ‘prudent’ ‘economics’ man Gordon Brown
That is the view of one writer published this morning by the Daily Telegraph group in London. Ineptitude is what Gordon Brown is being accused of. And excess costs. Linked with CrossRail. The writer says there is a much better and more economic solution available ….as compared with the costs and the irrelevance of CrossRail!


To be continued

The MUHAMMAD HAQUE daily world ethical commentary
1200 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 8 January 2008


Coming later on today [8 January 2008] in the Muhammad Haque daily ethical commentary on Gordon Brown the examination of the following aspects of the uk premier who has already given the phrase ‘British vah-loos’ a precariously dubious identity….
How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to attack the people pushed into involuntary poverty and deprivation BY Brown’s own administration? How is it ‘British vah-loos’ to maintain discrimination and violate the ethical aspects of peoples’ rights while deriding the targeted people undergoing these assaults for not showing enough initiative? What initiatives does Gordon Brown in office at no 10 Downing Street, recognise as being consistent with his appreciation of ‘British vah-loos’? How is it that there are increasing numbers of ‘British’ people who are being pushed into rotting existence due to the failures of the state, the failures which Brown has been significantly reluctant to see in time ? Or see at all? How can Brown claim to know what any ‘vah-loos’ are when he is the prime minister who has been found with no acceptable explanation for the financial disasters that have come to light, not to speak of the robbery of peoples’ privacy contrary to their universal human rights? [to be continued]

How is it that so many items of evidence in Gordon Brown’s behaviour since he officially assumed the tenancy at No 10 Downing Street London SW1 in 2007 have been cited by the entire spectrum of ‘mainstream media commentators’ to support their derisive conclusive about Brown’s competence [etc] and not one of those items has been acknowledged as being remotely to do with Brown’s clouded collusion with the CRASSRail hole plotter Ken Livingstone? How long before these commentators agree with an echo the Khoodeelaar! Dissection of Gordon Brown’s seriously ill-advised and unjustifiable hype for the Big Business CRASSRail? And does Gordon Brown really understand the implications of What he is desperately letting himself in for? I mean, does Gordon Brown really have the democratic ability or the moral legitimacy to really take on people who care about and selflessly defend the environment?


[To be continued]



Muhammad Haque daily commentary
1350 Hrs GMT London Sunday 6 January 2008



’Difficult decisions! ‘Tough year 2008’! Gordon Brown again promoted Andrew Maar to the de facto post of a platform, which should have belonged in the Houses of parliament. And Brown should have been subjected to the overdue scrutiny on each and every single one of his assertions as he made those to the undeserved promotion of Andrew Maar and the BBC. That post would have existed if we had an accountable, assertive Parliament in the UK. Gordon Brown is abusing the position of Prime Minister just in the same way that Tony Blair did. And the abuse is going to get worse during this year. Appearing on the Andrew Marr Show, which is in fact the courier of the same baggage and garbage of propaganda that was stinkingly foisted on the viewing public/people with the over-oiled face of David Frost.. It is clear that if there has been any change after Frost vacated that slot which now flaunts Andrew Maar as the occupant] it has been for the worse. Gordon Brown has been able to make utterances on it that no self-resetting 'national' [meaning central UK] constituency in a 'world class' [!!! More on that crass slogan so fanatically promoted by Brown's 'new mate' the 'undone mayor' Ken Livingstone] should put up with from such a facile and banal occupier of No 10 Downing Street… His courtiers may not have told Gordon Brown this yet. But he is in danger of becoming ridiculously incredible unless he stops making these appearances.. I am going to do the scrutiny of four of his key utterances as made via the Andrew Marr embarrassment called the interview..


[To be continued]

By©Muhammad Haque
1148 Hrs GMT
London Friday 4 January 2008

On Tuesday 8 January 2008, Khoodeelaar! Will put to the ‘CrossRail Bill’ ‘select committee’ in the UK ‘House of Lords’ the summarised version of the key objections to the contents and the purpose of the Bill. We shall do so in the knowledge of the ‘guidelines’ already published by the bureaucracy of the House of Lords concerning the objections and the remits. We shall be doing s in accordance with the UK’s constitutional obligations to afford due and full contents and evidence of the objections to be presented to the UK Parliament against the CrossRail Bill. Throughout the period of the House of Lords committee’s ‘consideration’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ we shall be publishing every day appropriate additional updates, news reports and constitutional law commentaries here and on other related Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill CAMPAIGN web sites, blogs and other internet and electronic platforms.
For the LATEST Khoodeelaar! 'No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign news, comments and legal updates on the Khoodeelaar! Action against the Crossrail hole plot, CLICK HERE.


Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign against the London Crossrail hole plot Bill [the draft piece of legislation – a hybrid Bill, called the ‘CrossRail Bill’ - that is now being moved through the UK houses of parliament at the behest of Big Business interests prevailing over Gordon Brown’s administration. The Big Business lobby is set to loot UK ordinary peoples' money - we distinguish between 'taxpayers' money and the peoples' money - more on this at a later edition]. Khoodeelaar! Is a Seelotee [< ‘Sylhetti’ < ‘Sylhet’] language word devised by Muhammad Haque in the East End of London, to signify the defence against and to denote the destructive agenda by big business that has been afoot under covers of plots like the Crossrail hole scam. Khoodeelaar! Is the campaign that has created a new and current foundation of argument based on the evidence that is universally independently objectively verifiable. The arguments are at once revenant to the east end of London as we as to the rest of the inner cities UK. By accessible extension, the arguments are as valid in the east end of London as they are in those parts of other ‘western’ cities where income and social disparity are the essential ingredients of the [classic] capitalist [and its variants that are manifest in the local forms, mechanisms and scams of ] exploitation regimes. Khoodeelaar! Is currently preparing a series of constitutional law representations against the contents and the purpose of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ …that constitutional law campaign by Khoodeelaar! Defending the community in the East End of London begins in the first week of January 2008. Visit this and associated web sites to stay in touch with that stage of the universal and the historic campaign for the upholding of the rights of the people of the east End of London – and by extension of the advocacy in principle of those of the rights of all the pressurized, violated, disenfranchised destitute peoples in the UK inner cities and of the other parts of the world- and for the voicing of the rights in principle of the vast majority whose voices are not heard in the UK parliament... If with no complete success in getting the ‘select committee in the UK Parliament’s Upper Chamber [the ‘House of Lords’] to agree with our aims ….
for the records
Records that we shall be relying on and referring to at the next level and stage of our campaign which will be taken before the European judicial and constitutional platforms